Or not.
So you see, today I had my first lit tutorial (and this is where I shall digress a bit, in very Woolf-esque fashion, except with a bit more self-awareness; was very funny today in class cos my tutor - male - is about As Gay As They Get, and I suspect half my class is lesbian, of the stoic, tanned, short-mildly-bleached hair, t-shirt/berms variety; please just imagine the visual juxtaposition, it is very funny), and we did some poetry. We didn’t really have a whole lot of time, so we just discussed one poem. I shall post it here, because I know some lit buffs read this thing:
The art of losing isn’t hard to master;
so many things seem filled with the intent
to be lost that their loss is no disaster,
Lose something every day. Accept the fluster
of lost door keys, the hour badly spent.
The art of losing isn’t hard to master.
Then practice losing farther, losing faster:
places, and names, and where it was you meant
to travel. None of these will bring disaster.
I lost my mother’s watch. And look! my last, or
next-to-last, of three beloved houses went.
The art of losing isn’t hard to master.
I lost two cities, lovely ones. And, vaster,
some realms I owned, two rivers, a continent.
I miss them, but it wasn’t a disaster.
– Even losing you (the joking voice, a gesture
I love) I shan’t have lied. It’s evident
the art of losing’s not too hard to master
though it may look like (Write it!) a disaster.
- One Art, Elizabeth Bishop
So yes (I really like this poem, by the way). One Art. We had all of 10 minutes to talk about it because our tutor needed to do the admin stuff (digression again - shit la if I don’t get A for this mod I will be damn dulan etc; tutor seems like very funny guy - Jo, he is the one I mentioned to you the other time), and so, the only people commenting on the poem were really myself and this other guy who is so completely forgettable that I didn’t actually give a shit whether he was gay or not (but! nevertheless! perfectly nice person, I am sure! Because apparently these days you cannot be honest about people without it coming to bite you at some point of time).
Okay, so long story short, I said my piece and my tutor was like, “Okay, but why are you so clinical in your approach!”
To which I now disclaim I take zero offence to. I concur, I was being extremely clinical about the way I had approached the poem. Style, patterns, transitions, nuances in argument. Yes.
But I am not clinical! I am not a clinical person! And so it really frustrates me! Because, thanks to my tutor’s very incisive observation (and no, I’m not being ironic here), I realise, that yes, I have somehow become extremely clinical in the manner I articulate myself, and somewhere, somehow, I have forgotten what it means to really say precisely how I feel, as it is.
And really, this sheds like 231212398% more clarity on how difficult it was for me to approach my first play (the ghost one) because the things I’d wanted to write about, are things about deep, deep feelings and angst and melancholy and pain etc, which are precisely the things that are not supposed to be written about clinically. And as it is, look at how structured and organised this paragraph has been! I hate it! And - yes, this is where I’m actually gonna try to be ironic - I think it is horrible how in striving for precision in language over the past n number of years, I have somehow lost the ability to articulate myself with the clarity I would like to!
So anyway, ya la, rant finish. Slightly more light-hearted tidbit. Quotable quote from today’s class - “I have been called many things all my life (he has a somewhat non-conventional English name, prone to mispronunciation), and I remember in NS I had this very post-modern moment… that the self is so multi-farious, and the name…” - the quote ends here because I was too busy chuckling to myself and rushing to text T about this to catch the rest of his sentence. But you get the idea.